Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:28 PM
However, there are also some pretty discouraging cons like lack of privacy, intense scrutiny, and stalkers. Just take a look at Britney Spears. Her fame as driven her to medical insanity. She has paparazzi lurking around every corner ready to judge every bad decision she makes. She's lost custody of her children, and her father must approve all of her expenditures before she makes them. She's been pushed over the edge.
That being said, would you want to become famous? If so, what would you be famous for? What would you do with your fame? What or who would you hope to inspire?
I wouldn't want to become famous on a large scale because I enjoy my privacy and wouldn't be able to handle the lack thereof. I make enough money to be able to live comfortably with my husband, and that's really all I can ask for. However, I am already famous for my teaching. I made the school and local newspapers. I'm not sure that counts. Aside from my teaching, I think I could become famous for my swimming. I'm pretty sure I could break a record of longest swim. I'd probably try to do something admirable with my fame like set up some sort of program for youngsters. I'd try to inspire anyone who wanted to swim as an athleticly or leisurely.
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:30 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:30 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:31 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:33 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:44 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 06:54 PM
there are two kinds of fame i guess and for talking sake i'll call one fame and the other celebrity. celebrity is worthless - celebrity is being famous for being famous, being famous for being paris hilton etc. these people have not achieved anything remarkable, they aren't intelligent, impressive, brave or special in any way. they are simply famous, they are cardboard stock personalities like DIVA who people like to read about because people are stupid. this kind of fame i find really unattractive and i kind of feel lame by even talking about it. it's so bad, so worthless and stupid that putting more thought into it than "pfft, idiots." is embarassing.
the other kind of fame is more like being renowned. you've done something and people know about you because it was remarkable, intelligent, impressive, brave or special. you are a renowned author, filmmaker. a renowned politicial activist, or humanitarian - whatever you done, or how you live, it's remarkable so people know about you for it. this isn't fame of personality, although it usually helps, but you've got some substance there and people are interested because you do interesting things.
that kind of fame i wouldn't have any particular problem with. i mean the paparazzi are banging down the doors of the jokes and the spectacles, not the substantial. cos you can't get a scandal out of those guys which can be explained in a headline.
i don't have any particular desire to be famous, but sure if i done something which i was proud of then i'd liked to be recognised for it in that field. people coming up "oh you're mr. jamicus, eh? i heard about that smashing report of yours! have a cigar why don't you!?!?!" - anybody would love that shit.
but the other kind is indulgent, pornographic, debasing and gross.
Posted 01 June 2008 - 08:47 PM
Posted 01 June 2008 - 10:02 PM
people that are famous just for being famous suck and represent everything that is evil and soulless
Posted 01 June 2008 - 10:21 PM
fame makes the process of socialization to be a really odd one, it is not natural.
Posted 01 June 2008 - 10:23 PM
When people are famous just for being famous, people just judge THEM, as people.
Everyone is flawed and imperfect, bound to be ridiculed or judged somehow. Its not a coincidence if people in reality shows usually seem horrible, or stupid, because thats what people really are, and the more you follow someone's life closely, the more you come to terms with how human and flawed they are. People are arrogant, vain, weird, dumb, naive, ugly. People are people. Anyone has a potential scandal about his past, his opinions on stuff, whatever.
Its for the same reasons marriages fail a lot these days: people are in love with who they think the other person is, but as they live with them for longer and longer, they come to realize the person they are with isn't who they thought. The more you know someone, the more chances you have of having reasons of hating that person.
But when someone is known for his work instead, only his work is judged. I think thats a much more healthy kind of fame, even if its much less glamorous.
Posted 01 June 2008 - 10:29 PM
LOLWTU? You teh luight sbarMAN N9WOAIWIA !I AM ONE TOTO IM A MAST OMFG LINK BREAK ONSKAE AND BUGS ANG GUTS AND ASTLOOS SOTNES STEOPSDMS PLEASD SAMAKE ME ADMIN
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users